So '34-pyeong type' usually means supply area, and the exclusive area you actually live on is smaller than that. The share exclusive area takes within supply area is the exclusive-area ratio. The higher it is, the more usable space you get for the same nominal size.
Same 34 pyeong, one feels bigger?
Back to the opening puzzle. Both homes are '34 pyeong,' yet one feels roomier — here's the reason.
Say complex A is a corridor-type building with wide shared space, and complex B is a stairwell-type with narrow shared space. Supply area is 34 pyeong for both. But B's exclusive area can be larger. Same supply-area price-per-pyeong, different space underfoot.
So one rule. When you compare price-per-pyeong, you compare like area standard with like. No exceptions.
- Supply-area price-per-pyeong against supply-area only.
- Exclusive-area price-per-pyeong against exclusive-area only.
- Mix the two and the exclusive-area ratio gap walks right in as an illusion.
Take the same 900-million-won home. Divide by a 34-pyeong supply area and you get about 26.5 million won per pyeong; divide by a 25-pyeong exclusive area and you get about 36 million won per pyeong. Same home, just a different basis, and the number swings by nearly ten million. So when someone says 'A is cheaper per pyeong than B,' the first thing to fire back is: "Which area standard is that?"
Pyeong and square meters, in your head
The official notation now is square meters (㎡), but in actual conversation 'pyeong' still rolls off the tongue. Move between the two freely and no listing will throw you.
- 1 pyeong ≈ 3.3㎡. Precisely it's 3.305785㎡, but 3.3 is plenty for a rough cut.
- ㎡ to pyeong: divide by 3.3. 84㎡ → 84 ÷ 3.3 ≈ 25 pyeong.
- Pyeong to ㎡: multiply by 3.3. 34 pyeong → 34 × 3.3 ≈ 112㎡.
One more thing. Common figures like '84㎡' or '59㎡' usually mean exclusive area. That's why an ad's '34-pyeong type (supply)' and a registry's 'exclusive 84㎡' often point to the very same home. Checking the unit and the standard together — that's the habit that guards you against the illusion.
Lining up neighborhoods and complexes
The real payoff of price-per-pyeong is putting different things on the same row. Totals of 900 million and 1.1 billion are hard to weigh in your head; 30 million per pyeong versus 34 million per pyeong land instantly.
But the comparison only means something if you match conditions. Same area standard is the floor, and ideally you compare similar size ranges. It's observed on record that smaller units tend to carry a higher price-per-pyeong than larger ones, generally. Smaller homes looking pricier per unit of area is a common pattern.
And yet price-per-pyeong isn't a cure-all
It's a powerful ruler, no argument. But it can't catch every difference. Even within the same complex, same size, same area standard, prices vary home to home — and for real reasons.
- Floor — At the same size, a low floor and a prime floor are valued differently.
- Orientation — South-facing versus north-facing changes the light and the feel.
- Age and condition — At the same size, a new build and an aging complex get assessed differently.
- View and building position — Even inside a complex, whether the building ahead blocks your view matters.
This is the spot I personally trip over most. Set the big picture with price-per-pyeong, sure — but it can't be the whole of a final call. Sort the row with price-per-pyeong first, then filter again within it by floor, orientation, age. A two-step way of looking.
Today's takeaway
Price-per-pyeong is a conversion device for 'how much for the same chunk of space.' The key is to always compare on the same area standard (exclusive with exclusive, supply with supply) and among similar conditions.
This piece isn't here to hand you an answer. It's here to put one ruler in your hand — so that in front of a listing you can ask yourself, "Which area standard is this?" and "What's there beyond price-per-pyeong?"